Pale moon crisis12/28/2023 It’s ridiculous how many projects are all doing essentially the same thing, but each of them periodically go through this existential crisis. Everyone and their dog has some derivative desktop email client out there with a handful of devs or less and no real entity behind it to ensure a long term commitment. The biggest drawback though is the lack of commitment. It seems like it has all the worst habits of Firefox and interface functionality and styling that has always felt bulky or something to me. Unfortunately the Mozilla mail codebase, neglected or under-developed over the years, doesn’t do it for me. Nothing has ever come close to Eudora 7 for me. I’d love a decent desktop email client again. Maybe a new maintainer might fix that.īut without a portable version, I can’t consider it. I would recommend it to anyone over TB if privacy above and beyond that which can be provided by the OS is not an issue. Also for the cloud, an encrypted self-extracting zip file with the container and the portable version of the container app.Īfter a long run with Pale Moon, I went to Cyberfox a few years ago but I did consider FossaMail and ran it on a test system for a while.įM is an excellent client. In the long run, this method became most convenient for backup: the container daily to a USB stick, stored in a fireproof safe, and the NAS. Several years ago I began to run Haller’s portable version in a TrueCrypt (now another one) container. And the primary reason I stopped donating.Īs well, an extension to that end is unacceptable for all the obvious reasons. The lack of an embedded encryption scheme is beyond reasoning and requests for such have fallen first on deaf ears then the dearth of development energy. and online commerce became a default in those landscapes, far too much critical data was stored in that wide-open profile folder. I’ve been using TB since 2004, v0.6 I think, when my email needs were far more casual than today.Īs “paperless” interaction with finance, insurance, health care, etc. Another option is keeping it alive but doing only what is absolutely necessary, but that is probably the last desirable outcome for the current maintainer of the project. Since Moonchild cannot give FossaMail the attention the project deserves anymore, it could very well mean the end of the project. It is unclear what is going to happen if no new maintainer is found. Moonchild notes that there is no requirement to keep on using Pale Moon's backend for the messaging program. One interesting tidbit of the decision is that the new maintainer may select a different codebase for FossaMail. Signing an agreement that binds the maintainer to the requirements.Keeping users safe by updating the program regularly with security updates.Keep the general spirit of the program (independent, vendor-neutral, mail, news and chat without in-app ads.In return, Moonchild has the following requirements for the new maintainer: Pale Moon is compatible with several plugins and extensions of Firefox and has several exclusive extensions of its own, for example, Adblock Latitude.The new maintainer will get full ownership of the FossaMail brand and trademarks, and the domain name. A perk for current Firefox users is that all bookmarks, settings and extensions are imported upon installation of the program. Cooperation with allows for the start page to be personalized and users are able to create their own themes. The default search engine is not Google or Yahoo, but rather DuckDuckGo and geolocation functions are not left to Google either, instead utilizing IP-API. ![]() The program is updated regularly and supports CSS3 and HTML5. Pale Moon differs from other web browsers in that it focuses on features and functions that are actually desired and not those that are incorporated in other web browser simply for the sake of competition. The forum initiates conversations to receive community input and conducts polls which include users in the development process of future updates. The attention given to the thoughts and ideas of actual everyday users truly allows for Pale Moon to be a community web browser. Though obviously very similar to Firefox, Pale Moon stands alone in its own right. There are several different default settings in Pale Moon that allow customization of the users browsing session, while providing optimum speed simultaneously. ![]() The user interface, which is completely customizable, also differs in that certain elements were added and icons on the toolbar are placed in different locations than of those on Firefox.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |